Friday, December 31, 2010
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Monday, December 27, 2010
Travel Blender For Babies
MARIN, RY 2003
OTHER TEACHING OF ART EDUCATION
This text tries to convey the complexity of a good education for arts education specifying the changes it has had throughout history, which affected education in changing the way schools teach methods such as drawing. We
transmits the work involved the construction of an image or object role of the artist to build their visual and artistic work, whether in the arts of design, painting, ceramics and sculpture. All these are different areas of art which requires a concept of material and processing time, all this thinking about his role .. We cite
six stages of evolution:
Plantón and Aristotle, philosophers who gave us an orientation in antiquity arts education in schools, mentioning the drawing as teaching excellence for life.
It shows the change in the concept of teaching in the Middle Ages be had, giving more importance to material and function on media taught in workshops. These were called handicrafts since built their own working materials for the execution of works with an aesthetic concept not in the end after they had, but with a functional concept.
Before imparting art education in schools generally for it, just existed and more schools Renaissance drawing, which highlights the artist Vasari, who promoted this school. All instruction was aimed at drawing as essential to the art. Focused on the copy of sculptures, sequenced parts of the body by facilitating its implementation to make drawings to more complex natural character.
This makes the drawing SXIX considered the primary area art schools, causing the problem of teaching drawing to the population, which is required for new industries
Art aesthetic and descriptive technique come together to form the concept dibujistico.
Pestalozzi is the author of one book for children according to art education in the drawing, which supports the idea that you should familiarize freehand drawing, not through facilitators utensils ello.Esto synthesize a better perception visual and learning. Friedrich introduced the idea of \u200b\u200bdrawing and manual methods in the second half of the century were provided to primary schools.
also found a new way of looking at children's art in SXX half, where diagrams and doodles were considered a different way of seeing reality and the world at large, giving to understand the minds of children through their own drawings, abstraction, cubism are synthesized and similar movements that art form child of which we speak.
In the Second half of SXX there is a path from self-expression to the art and discipline education, giving more importance to the student transmitter sensitive feelings, apprentice at the same area. All this comes to a student has to face the future art world, learning to be an individual transmitter of ideas and feelings through his work. That is why I conclude that the goal of good art education would be the student's creative capacity, formulating questions and making you think to yourself, since many teachers today are those same problem solving without thinking and research, essential where reflection and research, the resolution and production of issues make the student a better person.
occurs also the creation of the agency (UNESCO), the highest rise in education where I get to create the organization's most important art education at the international level (INSEE). One of the most important was when in 1955 adopted arts education in primary and secondary where the primary was based on free expression, considering the visual language and art as a form of knowledge.
Of all the projects the DBAE, discipline based arts education aims to develop knowledge to appreciate and value art, and I think is the most successful because it is based on a number of criteria that are essential for good education, must have both a broad agenda encompassing aesthetics, art criticism, art history and art forms (drawing, painting, ceramics, sculpture and architecture), and creative ability.
also agree with the assertion that works of art should occupy a central to this discipline, I think his study is part of the story and that is part of our past and future of art that we must not forget.
PROS AND CONS OF STAGES:
affinity WHAT REMAINS WITH DIFFERENT VIEWS DEVELOPED ALONG THE ART EDUCATION?
Monica Geller Haircut
the end of art, Danto.
In this paper, we question the art Danto is to come, assuming it still exists in the future and say his death coming. Open fields of art such as works and your future perception, the music, dance and many other arts, considered at this time, unimaginable in times past because it could not be seen as art in the past for lack of precedents.
There are thousands of possibilities for change, but is considered a highly innovative work coming in, will always have something older that makes us think about his past.
Referring to Hegel's thesis, firms and supposed death remains an art, and there are doubts about its future as an example by putting `` source''of Duchamp, nobody would say that in the past a simple urinary considered one of the most widely spoken art history and commentary.
caught my eye a phrase, I would say that in context all that today there is something that makes us remember the past, is that''nothing outside its own time as the incursion of a time in your future.
If we try to think of something future, will always be a reconstruction of what we see, observe and know. is that in the future will we be a reflection of what really went?. Danto
art as serious in the future would show only a mirror reflecting our image of what we already know.
Technological advances are one of the causes of the changing world, and art generally, reaching change. This is one of the reasons for the death not the same as someone will do something different, new, create, or not based on antedecentes earlier, because art makes history as the film
with new films created through games, such as science and medicine creates new curative drugs.
Personally I found it monotonous reading of it, actually established on the death of art, and I'm not seeing anything sane in the radical assertion that makes Danto.
How can you say that art has died before, that we who are evolving entities, but at some point cease to exist. I think the story will never die like the film, dance, philosophy, science, art is the aesthetic and historical knowledge of evolutionary change.
Sunday, December 26, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)